| Current IssueIssue 96Issue 95Issue 94Issue 93Issue 92Issue 91Issue 90Issue 89Issue 88Issue 87Issue 86Issue 85Issue 84Previous Issues |
| Collaring or Culling: The Fraser Island Dingo |
|
Save Fraser Island Dingoes Inc
The latest project by Qld. National Parks (DERM) is to attach tracking collars to 20 dingoes in the hope of monitoring the animals movements over the Island. Whilst research is needed scientist's question the ethics of using such an invasive device and dingo experts believe these collars will be even more detrimental than the ear tags. It is widely considered by animal behaviourist's and the scientific community that no surveillance method should be used which is likely to interfere with the animals' ability to function naturally, but these tracking collars will disrupt normal dingo behaviour, some animals may be ostracized or even killed by other members of the pack, the collars will also interfere with normal foraging and hunting, so how will the data collected be deemed to be accurate? Tourists and local residents are appalled on seeing these cumbersome collars and there are many doubts as to veracity of this methodology, we ask the Minister Ms. Kate Jones and Qld National Parks (DERM) the following questions.. What ethics/approvals have been obtained and from where? What studies have been done to ensure these devices will not interfere with natural behaviours such as hunting, whelping, feeding pups and interacting with other pack members? What University staff are involved and what are the credentials of those involved in this study? Sub-adults are mentioned, what is the actual age of the animals collared? What is the purpose of locating dens? In the past den identification has not prevented the areas from being burnt out. There is some confusion as to how the release mechanism functions. How will those monitoring know when an animal is entangled, unable to hunt or care for pups? Especially since the rangers leave the Island in the evening. What is the explicit purpose of this research and what is hoped to be achieved? If the results indicate the dingoes are in crisis, what will be your response? How do you reconcile the use of these collars with your policy of regarded dingoes as "wild, native animals that should be interfered with as little as possible" and of "conserving the species in a near-natural environment."? This study is inhumane and obviously inhibits the natural behaviours of the animals, the collars should be removed, the project suspended forthwith and a more ethical method of research examined...
|
Comments
In my experience, the presence of collars rarely impacts upon the individuals & is far less intrusive than other methods such as visually tracking & capturing. What methods are you proposing? This article seems to miss the point of what appears to be the goal of the study: learn more about the dingo's behaviour & habits so that they can be better managed into the future.
Rather than taking juvenile potshots in the public media, get on board & ask how you can assist in improving the knowledge of a population that interacts with humans like no other, & ensure that they are best protected into the future.
How much restriction does a wide collar have in stopping the dingo’s neck rotating to its fullest extent especially when trying to capture its prey?
The size of the tracking device reflects the lack of compassion by the researchers in gathering this data. Do these collars need to be so large, when you have children going to school with GPS enabled mobile phones small enough to fit into the palm of their tiny hands.
I think we are not focusing on the real issue here, which is that the collection of data is just a furphy, the government wants to cull the dingo on Fraser Island, all it needs is some figures it can manipulate to achieve their desired outcome.
DW
.
.
RSS feed for comments to this post.