Home Beware of second-rate science on wind farms and health
Beware of second-rate science on wind farms and health

Clean Energy Council

windThe clean energy industry has urged governments and the broader community to beware of misleading claims about wind farms and health by anti-wind power activists and to reject their calls for extra regulations that would send jobs and investment out of Australia.

Clean Energy Council acting Chief Executive Kane Thornton said government documents indicated that NSW Health had repeatedly warned state ministers ahead of the release of recent draft wind planning guidelines that there was no evidence for so-called ‘wind turbine syndrome'.

"While people's health should always be the number one priority, the approach taken by governments must be informed by legitimate health experts," Mr Thornton said.

"But news reports today demonstrate yet again that statements about the health impacts of wind farms made by anti-wind farm interest groups should be taken with more than a few grains of salt."

This was further borne out in a statement released today by the Climate and Health Alliance, a coalition representing groups such as the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and the Australian Psychological Society, that renewable energy such as wind power provides a safe alternative to fossil fuels.

"The medical community has rejected the scare campaign being run by interest groups such as the Waubra Foundation, which was set up and funded by anti-wind power campaigners," Mr Thornton said.

"This group's claims run completely counter to the findings of an opinion poll released by Pacific Hydro last week showing that some 80 per cent of those surveyed in NSW, Victoria and South Australia support wind power, an energy source that now provides power for the equivalent of more than 900,000 Australian homes.

"The NSW Government's dismissal of second-rate science about wind farms and health is a warning to Australians about the danger of taking the claims of anti-wind power groups on face value."

 

Share
 

Comments  

 
0 #1 Bayne Geikie 2012-02-10 04:15
Soinds like the Clean Energy Council (CEC) could be indulging in a bit of self-interested tobacco-science & is discounting what may be a legitimate claim of the effects of low & ultra low noise is mightily disrespectful. I can gurantee that no-one in CEC would be prepared to fund a proper study into any effects. Once upon a time lowfrequency sound waves were weaponised, same for the claim that low freq sound was responsible for whale disorientation. Indeed if you know anything about electricity, there could even be field-effects of theturbine generators. The CEC jusy lost some of its credibility...but who cares if anyone suffers from genertation side-effects, we are fighting global warming & there has to be a bit of collateral damage doesn't there?? Judt keep the lid on it.
 
facebook twitter feed vimeo

Advertisement

Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner

Partners